Administration - Research Publications
Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://kr.cup.edu.in/handle/32116/2
Browse
Item Mapping ‘consistency’ in India’s climate change position: Dynamics and dilemmas of science diplomacy(Springer, 2015) Gupta, Himangana; Kohli, R.K.; Ahluwalia, Amrik SinghIndia’s position on climate change negotiations is likely to have far reaching implications for the success of global climate cooperation. Since the beginning of negotiations, the principle of equity and common but differentiated responsibilities (CBDR) remained the centerpiece of India’s stand. The stand started to evolve at the 15th Conference of Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change at Copenhagen in 2009, when India accepted voluntary commitments to reduce emission intensity. Though India still swears by CBDR, status of the principle in the negotiations has become doubtful after the Durban Climate Conference in 2011 committed all parties to take emission targets. This paper traces major transition points in India’s negotiating position over the years and provides a descriptive context of its climate-related concerns. It analyzes the interview responses of 15 top scientists, experts, and negotiators to build upon core areas of climate change issues in India, its future role, and position in negotiations. Interviewees, in general, were in favor of protecting the carbon space for the poor who had very low emissions.Item Tunnel Vision In Climate Policy: A Case Study Of CDM Forestry Projects In India(Indian Academy of Social Sciences, 2015) Gupta, Himangana; Ahluwalia, Amrik Singh; Kohli, R.K.This paper attempts to find out the social, economic andenvironmental impacts of the forestry projects under theClean Development Mechanism (CDM) of the KyotoProtocol. It is a case study of two -reforestation projects-undertaken by the private sector in the forest-richChhattisgarh, Odisha and Andhra Pradesh states of India.Some of the most fertile and forested regions ofChhattisgarh, Odisha and Andhra Pradesh have beendeclared as-severely degraded - on the basis of satellitedata for the purpose of CDM reforestation projects. Theprojects are on the lands owned by poor tribal people whohave been weaned away from subsistence farming. Theeconomic benefits of the project go to private companiesthat manufacture paper and fibre boards while the poorfarmers wait for the next harvest for succor. The project hasalso taken away much of the grazing lands from the villagers.Apart from leading to loss of biodiversity, eucalyptusplantations are known to be bad for total ecologicaleconomics. This is an example of how the market basedmechanisms of the Kyoto Protocol add to the pressure onbiodiversity.