| dc.contributor.author | Kumar, Deepak | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2018-07-10T07:30:43Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2018-07-10T07:30:43Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2015 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Kumar, Deepak (2015) Euthanasia or Mercy killing: A Judicial Perspective. International Research Journal of Management Sociology and Humanities. Vol. 6 No. 5. PP. 156-159 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2348– 9359 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://kr.cup.edu.in/handle/32116/1184 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Everyone believe in development and innovations.The judiciary is also on the same way has developed and introduced useful concepts. Expansion of the dimensions of Right to Life under Art. 21 is the example and evidence also on this view. But in the last few decades some special crafts have been dedicated to this very end by judiciary. On that a debate has started and different opinions came and remains in highlights in the country. Some argued that it should be the part of Right to life and some are. In consideration the issue it came out that the right to die, together with its subsidiary issues like euthanasia may or may not be used as the exception to general rule. This created the havoc in the society and the responsibility again come on the judiciary. And the judiciary had proved itself again by the visionary views. | en_US |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
| dc.subject | Euthanasia | en_US |
| dc.title | Euthanasia or Mercy killing: A Judicial Perspective | en_US |
| dc.type | Article | en_US |
| dc.identifier.url | http://www.irjmsh.com/volumedetails.aspx?vol=6&issue=5 | |
| dc.title.journal | International Research Journal of Management Sociology and Humanities | |
